If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only completed In the event the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and the petitioner company responded to your allegations therefore they were well conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
14. Within the light from the position explained above, it really is concluded that a civil servant incorporates a fundamental right to get promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be deemed for no fault of his possess and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the duration of service or during the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only accomplished Should the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence as well as petitioner company responded for the allegations therefore they were nicely conscious of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed towards the disposal of the moment petition around the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner in addition to private respondents and will choose care of every one of the aspects of the case and guarantee that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of the laws, the legal system adheres towards the doctrine of stare decisis
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the burden specified to any reported judgment may well rely on the reputation of both the reporter along with the judges.[seven]
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents in the boy or Female don't approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they could do if they will Slash off social relations with the son or the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by legislation.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, it is also a well-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work free case law search pakistan as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mold the relief to make it acceptable into the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or even the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified through the decision on the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated above. However no harassment shall be caused to possibly party and also the case shall be decided with the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more
Statutory laws are Individuals created by legislative bodies, which include Congress at both the federal and state levels. Although this sort of legislation strives to shape our society, giving rules and guidelines, it would be unattainable for virtually any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
Usually, only an appeal accepted through the court of very last resort will resolve such differences and, For a lot of reasons, these kinds of appeals are often not granted.
Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may perhaps seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more